====================================================================== Title: The Hermeneutic Fractal Date: 2022-06-15 Tags: box3 Link: https://spool-five.com/box3/20220615t000005--the-hermeneutic-fractal__box3/ Word Count: 321 ====================================================================== #philosophy[1], #hermeneutics[2] =>[1] https://spool-five.com/box3/20220602t000000--philosophy__box3/ =>[2] https://spool-five.com/box3/20230826t002030--hermeneutics__philosophy_box3/ There has been some debate over the image of the "circle" when discussing the hermeneutic circle[3]. A circle is an established geometric shape with highly regular features like a centre-point and so on. However, when most people talk about the hermeneutic circle, they are talking about a kind of _recursive relation_ between two points. It is more appropriate, perhaps, to describe this relation as _circlular_ rather than as a _circle_. For example, Paul Ricoeur tends to prefer the metaphor of a _spiral_, since the hermeneutic relation implies some kind of movement outside of a simple circle-like orbit. When travelling the path of the circle, we always arrive back where we started. In the process of hermeneutic understanding, however, the is a _returning motion_, but we never arrive exactly where we started. When I travel abroad for the first time, I learn about new cultures and languages, then, when I _return home_, my home has also been transformed, I now notice peculiarities about my own culture that aren't shared elsewhere, and so on. So, the motion is more akin to a spiral than a circle. =>[3] https://spool-five.com/box3/20220615t000006--the-hermeneutic-circle__box3/ However, we can perhaps expand this even further. A fractal is a type of geometric figure that has: - infinite depth - patterns that _scale_ The hermeneutic process works in a similar sense, there are "circles all the way down". There is a hermeneutic, circular relation between the reader and the book, between the overall book and the chapters of the book, between a chapter and its scenes, between a sentence and a paragraph, between words and sentences, between the reader and themselves, between the book and its historical context, and on and on _ad infinitum_. Each level of relation is like a fractal viewed at different scales. :TODO: [maybe something here about James' The figure in the Carpet]